{"cip_id":"0001","title":"Replace the SV tranche time delays with a weighted reward","status":"Final","counts":{"sibling_cips":2,"forum_posts":0,"forum_topics":0,"mailing_messages":1,"mailing_threads":1,"github_items":1,"blog_posts":0,"youtube_videos":0,"total":4},"sibling_cips":[{"id":"0002","cip_number":2,"title":"Minor adjustments to the Tokenomics variables to fine tune BME tokenomics","status":"Replaced","reason":"mentioned-in-content"},{"id":"0003","cip_number":3,"title":"Consensus layer, as it focuses on validator participation, rewards, and network stability, with some overlap in Peer Services due to the operational aspects of nodes","status":"Final","reason":"mentioned-in-content"}],"forum_posts":[],"forum_topics":[],"mailing_messages":[{"id":"151","thread_id":"112338050","thread_title":"Draft CIP 00XX - Super Validator Total Weight Limit","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Chris Zuehlke","sent_at":"2025-04-18T20:40:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/151","subject":"Splice release 0.6.5 is ready for deployment on TestNet","snippet":"All – Cumberland DRW would like to introduce a new CIP to establish clearly defined limits on the total weight of all Super Validators that may operate within the network. As previously discussed, thi","cip_id_match":false}],"mailing_threads":[],"github_items":[{"id":"canton-foundation/cips#22","type":"pr","repo":"canton-foundation/cips","number":22,"title":"cip 0001 header","state":"closed","author":"hythloda","created_at":"2025-02-20T17:29:16Z","url":"https://github.com/canton-foundation/cips/pull/22","snippet":""}],"blog_posts":[],"youtube_videos":[],"derivedAt":"2026-09-06T10:28:34.935Z","source":"derived from cips + forum_posts + mailing_messages + github_items + blog_posts + youtube_videos","canonical":"https://ccpedia.xyz/cips/0001/citations"}