{"cip_id":"0003","title":"Consensus layer, as it focuses on validator participation, rewards, and network stability, with some overlap in Peer Services due to the operational aspects of nodes","status":"Final","counts":{"sibling_cips":2,"forum_posts":0,"forum_topics":0,"mailing_messages":7,"mailing_threads":3,"github_items":1,"blog_posts":0,"youtube_videos":0,"total":10},"sibling_cips":[{"id":"0070","cip_number":70,"title":"Adjusting Reward Caps for Validators","status":"Withdrawn","reason":"mentioned-in-content"},{"id":"0096","cip_number":96,"title":"Removing Liveness Rewards from Validator Rewards Pool","status":"Approved","reason":"mentioned-in-content"}],"forum_posts":[],"forum_topics":[],"mailing_messages":[{"id":"444","thread_id":"116755566","thread_title":"CIP-0096: Remove Liveness Rewards from Validator Rewards Pool","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Andrew Bryan","sent_at":"2025-12-26T19:07:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/444","subject":null,"snippet":"… llowing a party to create a MintingDelegation contract will not be impacted by this CIP. Motivation CIP-0003 was initially raised to provide incentives to operate necessary infrastructure to interact with the …","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"430","thread_id":"116755566","thread_title":"CIP-0096: Remove Liveness Rewards from Validator Rewards Pool","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Andrew Bryan","sent_at":"2025-12-21T20:48:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/430","subject":null,"snippet":"… llowing a party to create a MintingDelegation contract will not be impacted by this CIP. Motivation CIP-0003 was initially raised to provide incentives to operate necessary infrastructure to interact with the …","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"421","thread_id":"116755566","thread_title":"CIP-0096: Remove Liveness Rewards from Validator Rewards Pool","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Eric Saraniecki","sent_at":"2025-12-15T20:44:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/421","subject":null,"snippet":"…  Validators were always designed to earn their rewards from Activity Rewards. Liveness was added in CIP-0003 as a solution to a bootstrapping problem. In order to have enough CC to transact in the Network and …","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"418","thread_id":"116755566","thread_title":"CIP-0096: Remove Liveness Rewards from Validator Rewards Pool","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Andrew Bryan","sent_at":"2025-12-12T23:25:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/418","subject":null,"snippet":"Hi All, Per discussion in last week’s Foundation Tokenomics Committee working group, please see below a draft CIP from Cumberland to remove liveness rewards from the validator rewards pool (also attac","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"261","thread_id":"114293248","thread_title":"CIP-0070: Adjust Validator Reward Caps","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Andrew Bryan","sent_at":"2025-07-22T20:19:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/261","subject":null,"snippet":"Hi All, Please see below a draft CIP that Cumberland has been working on to adjust the Validator Reward caps. We welcome any feedback. Canton Improvement Proposal: Adjust Validator Reward Caps Abstrac","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"196","thread_id":"112336241","thread_title":"Potential CIP - Tx Requirements for Validator Rewards","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Fernando Vazquez","sent_at":"2025-05-23T07:51:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/196","subject":"Abstract","snippet":"Hi Chris and Chris, Could you elaborate and what the rationale for making the distinction below would be? We were debating if we should note those tx are with featured apps or not. On a different note","cip_id_match":false},{"id":"191","thread_id":"112336241","thread_title":"Potential CIP - Tx Requirements for Validator Rewards","group_slug":"cip-discuss","author":"Chris Zuehlke","sent_at":"2025-05-22T21:15:00.000Z","url":"https://lists.sync.global/g/cip-discuss/message/191","subject":"Abstract","snippet":"All - We have been working with Proof Group to formalize the CIP on this topic. We are ready to present it to the group for discussion. Please see the below, we would like to discuss it during tomorro","cip_id_match":false}],"mailing_threads":[],"github_items":[{"id":"canton-network/splice#827","type":"issue","repo":"canton-network/splice","number":827,"title":"Move unchanging parameters out of the issuance curve","state":"open","author":"canton-network-da","created_at":"2025-06-05T22:10:56Z","url":"https://github.com/canton-network/splice/issues/827","snippet":"[ This issue was auto-migrated from DA's internal repo (DACH-NY/canton-network-node#9350). Original author: @meiersi-da ] The following params are constant over all changes in the issuance curve: ``` "}],"blog_posts":[],"youtube_videos":[],"derivedAt":"2026-09-06T10:28:36.735Z","source":"derived from cips + forum_posts + mailing_messages + github_items + blog_posts + youtube_videos","canonical":"https://ccpedia.xyz/cips/0003/citations"}