CIP-0052 Monstera FZE as a SV at Weight - Eric Saraniecki
- I would like to attend.
- We, at Zenith, are very excited to see this type of infrastructure being built across the network. There are many routes to take here, and we've been courting various proposals from our side. It's even more relevant in our EVM/SVM environments and atomic legs to Daml mainnet.
Please add me to the list for the demo, as well as our head of product:
heslin.kim@...
norbert.vadas@... - Requesting a place
- Over the past several months, I’ve been increasingly focused on a question that seems central to the future of programmable markets and institutional tokenization:
If settlement becomes atomic and programmable, can compliance continue to operate as a sequential, off-chain process built around legacy workflows?
Recent discussions around “atomic compliance” on Canton strongly resonate with me — particularly the idea that sanctions checks, Travel Rule obligations, and compliance outcomes should be resolved within the same coordinated transaction flow as settlement itself.
I believe regulation is increasingly pushing the industry in this direction, especially with the GENIUS Act, CLARITY Act, and broader global focus on real-time supervisory expectations for tokenized financial systems.
The area I’ve been exploring through CompliLedger / TokenProof is what comes next beyond transaction-level compliance:
- persistent governance state
- rule/version lineage
- reproducible compliance proofs
- lifecycle enforcement
- solvency and authorization validation
- deterministic audit replay across the lifecycle of an asset or transaction
In other words, not just “was this transaction compliant at execution time,” but:
- what rules were active,
- what proofs were relied upon,
- what governance state existed,
- and can the decision be reproduced deterministically later?
I’m currently looking to validate whether this broader infrastructure direction resonates with:
1. a major issuer, and
2. a financial institution or market participant
particularly within the context of Canton, tokenized markets, and institutional digital asset infrastructure.
Would genuinely appreciate perspectives from others building in this space:
- Does this problem resonate?
- Are institutions beginning to think about compliance and governance as part of the transaction architecture itself rather than an external process layer?
- Is there interest in deterministic, lifecycle-level proof infrastructure beyond atomic transaction compliance?
Happy to connect directly with anyone exploring similar architecture challenges.Maranda, Founder - Compliledger This is a fantastic contribution to the Canton ecosystem. Thank you for building it. The UX is really nice, and the way the data is presented makes it easy to navigate. It's clear a lot of thought went into the design.
A few questions as I've been exploring it:
- On the parties page, there's a balance field I'd love to understand better. Could you clarify what that's measuring?
- On the featured app compliance metrics, I wasn't sure whether the figures reflect a specific time window or cumulative since inception. And I wasn't familiar with the term "over guidance." A brief definition there would be helpful to help explain the red numbers on the far right.
Would you be open to setting up a short video call with potential users to walk through the dashboard together? I would love a tutorial and so might some others. That would give us a chance to ask questions directly and to screen share.
Thanks.- 2026년 5월 23일 (토) 오전 12:58, hello via lists.sync.global <hello=spraay.app@...>님이 작성:
- 2026년 5월 23일 (토) 오전 12:58, hello via lists.sync.global <hello=spraay.app@...>님이 작성:
- Hi Daryn, solid feedback, thanks.Quick context on the 3%, that’s the primary mint and redeem path, sized for inventory creation.
Secondary AMM is 25 bps each way (0.5% round trip), which actually sits inside what a foreign investor typically pays just to reach DFM when you factor in broker fees, AED FX, NIN setup, and restricted DFM trading hours. The 25 bps secondary fee is exactly the LP impermanent loss question you raised, and you’re right — we’re working on a NAV-aware curve that recenters on oracle prints so LPs are not picked off around session opens.Arbitrage is not meant to happen via retail trading through the AMM. It is closed by authorized participants minting and redeeming at NAV and then quoting into the AMM, very much an ETF-style model, but Canton-native.On synthetics, lending, derivatives, and the on-chain prime broker idea, this is exactly the roadmap. DFMREIT as a vanilla rail is the boring part; it gets interesting when it becomes posted collateral, a perp or cash-settled underlying, a structured product input, and borrow inventory for shorts to compress spreads. Canton’s privacy and composability are well-suited to that kind of prime brokerage workflow, and we would rather be a foundational asset for it than try to build the entire stack ourselves.Best,
SunnyOn 05/22/2026 11:31 AM IST ds <ds@...> wrote:Thank you Sunny that’s an impressive product.My observation would be that your challenge is liquidity. At 3% round trip it makes arbitrage difficult and I’m not sure how the borrow markets work on those underlying assets. As a result you could be impairing AMM LPs from the start at 25bps ( or be seen to be).That may be an opportunity to build product around it - synthetics, lending, derivatives, structured products - all of which drive liquidity to the vanilla product and vice versa.I’d look at something like an on-chain prime broker.Kind regardsDarynSent from Outlook for iOS
From: globalSyncForum@... <globalSyncForum@...> on behalf of sunny via lists.sync.global <sunny=fractit.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 12:56:34 PM
To: globalSyncForum@... <globalSyncForum@...>
Subject: [global-synchronizer] Introducing Tokenized Real Estate Indices on CantonHi everyone,
I’m pleased to share that Fractit is now opening access to tokenized real estate indices for qualified investors on Canton. Starting up with DFMREIT, a tokenized Dubai Real Estate Index product.
Real estate index exposure is a major asset category, but access remains fragmented and difficult to integrate into digital markets. We are building an on-chain market for these assets so they can remain liquid 24/7 and become high-quality collateral across the network.
We would love to connect with fellow builders, ecosystem partners, and committee members to explore how real-world index assets can integrate across Canton applications.
Get access at markets.fractit.com
Best,
Sunny Kumar
CEO, Fractit
