Skip to content

Proposal: Canton Bilateral Discovery Library (CBDL)

OPENPull Request
by JaceCrypto10-03-2026Incoming
References:CIP-0056

Development Fund Proposal Submission

Proposal file: proposals/stableport-cbdl.md

---

Summary

Stableport proposes the Canton Bilateral Discovery Library (CBDL), a non-proprietary Logic SDK that standardizes private negotiation and T+0 atomic settlement for all CIP-56 assets. By providing a unified protocol for Indications of Interest (IOIs), it eliminates fragmented discovery silos and removes systemic settlement risk across the Canton Network without leaking market-moving intent.

---

Checklist

  • [x] Proposal file added under /proposals/
  • [x] Milestones and funding amounts defined
  • [x] Acceptance criteria included
  • [x] Alignment with Canton priorities described

---

Notes for Reviewers

Stableport is submitting the CBDL as a critical "Public Good" to address the current fragmentation in private asset discovery. We invite the Committee to focus on the following high-value alignments:

Privacy-Preserving Discovery:

The library utilizes Daml’s sub-transaction privacy to ensure that Indications of Interest (IOIs) remain strictly bilateral, preventing market-moving intent leakage to the Global Synchronizer or other participants.

Elimination of Settlement Risk:

By standardizing the "handshake" before the trade, the CBDL facilitates deterministic atomic swaps across independent participant nodes, directly supporting the 2026 goal of T+0 finality for institutional assets.

CIP-56 Native:

Architected specifically to be "plug-and-play" with the CIP-56 universal asset standard, ensuring compatibility with tokenized bonds, deposits, and equity already on the network.

Ecosystem Distribution:

The project includes a commitment to package the library for the Catalyst Package Manager (CPM), ensuring seamless adoption by Super Validators and application developers.

Security-First Milestone:

Milestone 1 is dedicated to a formal technical specification and a comprehensive Security Threat Model to be reviewed by the Committee before any core logic is finalized.