Skip to content
CCPEDIAby Unity Nodes

← CIP-0000 · citation graph

CITATIONS / CIP-0000

Canton Improvement Process for the Global Synchronizer on Canton Network · status: Approved

Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0000: sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.

108 total referencesSibling CIPs 2Forum posts 0Mailing messages 87GitHub items 19Blog posts 0YouTube videos 0JSONMCP: get_cip_citations

Sibling CIPs · 2

CIPs that declare a requires: dependency on CIP-0000, or reference it in their content.

Mailing-list messages · 87 · across 31 threads

Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id: only-here join.

  • … NodeAxis has no deployment, pilot, customer or production implementation of anything described. Per CIP-0000, moving past Draft needs one Super Validator to sponsor and a second to endorse. We are not a Super …

  • Abstract[cip-discuss] · @Amanda Martin · 5mo ago

    Please see below with an updated table CIP-00xx Title: Add Further Asset Management as a Super Validator (Weight 8.0) Author: Yiannis Varelas Status: Draft Type: Governance Created: 2025-11-26 Updated

  • Abstract[cip-discuss] · @Amanda Martin · 5mo ago

    Please see the updated CIP below. CIP-00xx Title: Add Further Asset Management as a Super Validator (Weight 8.0) Author: Yiannis Varelas Status: Draft Type: Governance Created: 2025-11-26 Updated: 202

  • Abstract[cip-discuss] · @Eric Saraniecki · 6mo ago

    thanks Yiannis - this makes sense similar to the QCP one In the revised CIP we seem to have lost some specificity on the milestones, if you can pull back in the langauge from the original proposal and

  • Abstract[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 6mo ago

    Hi all, After discussing with Further about the new format we want to follow for the app-based SV proposals, I'm posting here the updated version that incorporates the high water mark framework and al

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Veronica Augustsson · 6mo ago

    If we need a sponsor for this, 7RIDGE/C7 is pleased to sponsor. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R ​​​​ ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Eric Saraniecki · 6mo ago

    Very happy to endorse

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 6mo ago

    We are OK with 18 months. If there is no further comment we can move it to vote with 18 if you want to endorse. Y.

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Eric Saraniecki · 6mo ago

    thanks Yiannis - i think this is great and def something we will be able to use in other contexts going forward my only open question is around the timeline to achieve the burn recognition - i think 2

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 6mo ago

    Hi all, I had very good async calls and I'm posting here the updated Full CIP with the changes I proposed above plus a summary of the changes for reference. Summary of Amendments 1. Recalibration of M

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 6mo ago

    Hi all, Alex's feedback raised some async discussions with existing and potential new SVs. There is a valid broader concern around how activity-based weight fits the SV narrative. Rather than debate p

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 6mo ago

    Hi Alex, You’ve raised good points. I spoke with a few other SVs as well after your note. I’m going to hold off on pushing this to a vote for now and come back with an updated version that reflects th

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Alex Chen · 6mo ago

    Hi Yiannis, thanks for this submission. We're excited about QCP's involvement - prior to voting, I'm curious about some components about this proposal: Collateral Application: Would this be a part of

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Veronica Augustsson · 6mo ago

    We have spent some time with Yiannis and team on this CIP and would like to sponsor or endorse this CIP. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R ​​​​ ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 7mo ago

    CIP-00xx Title: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 10.0) Author: Yiannis Varelas, Eric Saraniecki Status: Draft Type: Governance Created: 2026-02-01 License: CC0-1.0 Abstract QCP Group propose

  • Since my last message, t here were multiple discussions on the CIP-00xx draft and I was able to chat with Foundation members, active participants, and Tharimmune leadership. While there is broad align

  • SV Reward Mechanics:[cip-discuss] · @Eric Saraniecki · 10mo ago

    hi everyone - I think many of you have a seen a few previous version of this I helped modify the draft to this version for the following reasons: 1. If Zenith can pull off the Demonstrated Composabili

  • SV Reward Mechanics:[cip-discuss] · @DrAmandaLMartin · 10mo ago

    Hello all, This CIP has undergone a re-write. Please see below open for discussion. ---- CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 10 CIP: CIP 00XX Title: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 10 Author: Norber

  • CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 8.75[cip-discuss] · @Norbert Vadas · 10mo ago

    Thank you for your comment and suggestion, Alex. CC burn amount: According to your suggestion, we've modified the burn amount in the "Canton Coin Integration" deliverable under the Growth/adoption KPI

  • CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 8.75[cip-discuss] · @Alex Chen · 10mo ago

    Thanks for this updated CIP and appendix - the changes have been positive to align the VBs and their technical workflow to Canton's tokenomics and governance. We'd like to get some clarity and suggest

  • CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 8.75[cip-discuss] · @Norbert Vadas · 10mo ago

    Dear GSF Members, Based on the questions received, we've added an appendix to our original proposal titled "CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of weight 8.75". The "Appendix 1 - Economic Relationship betwe

  • CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 8.75[cip-discuss] · @Yiannis Varelas · 10mo ago

    This is significant improvement compared to what was proposed initially. I also like the fact that the majority of the weight is shifted towards delivery. This is a technically ambitious, high-leverag

  • CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of Weight 8.75[cip-discuss] · @Norbert Vadas · 10mo ago

    Dear GSF Members, Please find below and attached our proposal "CIP-00XX: Add Zenith as an SV of weight 8.75", open for discussion. Please note that this proposal supersedes the previous one submitted

  • CIP-0080: Add Republic as an SV of Weight 6[cip-vote] · @DrAmandaLMartin · 11mo ago

    … e vote has closed for CIP-0080: Add Republic as an SV of Weight 6. Per the CIP process as listed in CIP-0000 votes are only open for 10 days. The next steps for this cip is to go back to CIP-discuss with revi …

  • CIP-0075: Add Zodia as a SV with max weight 5[cip-discuss] · @Pinar Emirdag · 11mo ago

    C7 is happy to sponsor this CIP. From: cip-discuss@... on behalf of DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global Date: Thursday, September 11, 2025 at 8:42 PM To: cip-discuss@... Subject: [cip-discuss] CIP-0

GitHub items · 19

Issues, PRs, and dev-fund proposals across all indexed Canton repositories that mention CIP-0000.

For AI agents

Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:

  • get_cip_citations: MCP tool. Input: {cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.
  • GET /api/v1/cips/0000/citations Returns a JSON shape mirroring this page.
  • The legacy /api/v1/cips/0000/mentions stays for backward compat. It returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.