Skip to content

← CIP-0008 · citation graph

CITATIONS / CIP-0008

Update and Refinement to CIP-0002 · status: Replaced

Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0008 — sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.

Sibling CIPs · 1

CIPs that declare a requires: dependency on CIP-0008, or reference it in their content.

Mailing-list messages · 1

Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id — only-here join.

  • CIP TBD: Traffic-Based App Rewards[cip-discuss] · @Simon Meier · 5mo ago

    Dear community, please find attached a proposal for improving the quality of the app reward incentives by removing featured app markers and instead basing an app’s rewards on the actual traffic spent

GitHub items · 4

Issues, PRs, and dev-fund proposals across all indexed Canton repositories that mention CIP-0008.

Blog posts · 2

Third-party coverage and ecosystem blog posts. Each links to the original publisher; CCPEDIA only indexes, doesn't republish.

For AI agents

Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:

  • get_cip_citations — MCP tool. Input: {cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.
  • GET /api/v1/cips/0008/citations — JSON shape mirroring this page.
  • The legacy /api/v1/cips/0008/mentions stays for backward compat — it returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.