VOTES / CIP-0047

Super Validators executed 2 DSO vote requests whose stated reasoning cites this CIP. This is the ledger record, so it says what was carried out rather than what was discussed.

• 2025-07-29 · Change AmuletRules config · Accepted 13 for / 0 against
• 2025-07-08 · Change AmuletRules config · Accepted 13 for / 0 against

Positions are parsed from each message's body text (most are one-line statements like "Five North in favor"). If parsing was uncertain, the row appears as position unclear below — please flag if you spot a misread.

• in favor
  DrAmandaLMartin

  Hello Super Validator Node Operators,   Please find the cip-0047: Featured App Activity Markers ready for vote  The PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/20   Digital Asset - SV Sponsor SVN (SBI)  - SV Endorser All other operators vote please via a reply of: <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  2025-03-17 15:27 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Veronica Augustsson

  C7/7RIDGE votes in favor     V E R O N I C A   A U G U S T S S O N​​​​   /   P A R T N E R ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWER THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Signature for V e r o n i c a A u g u s t s s o n toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2025-03-18 15:39 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Tradeweb votes

  Tradeweb votes in favor   toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2025-03-24 14:53 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  MPCH is

  MPCH is in favor   Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me     From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Justin Peterson via lists.sync.global <justin.peterson=tradeweb.com@...> Date: Monday, March 24, 2025 at 10:53 AM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP 0047 Featured App Activity Markers Tradeweb votes in favor   toggle quoted mes

  2025-03-24 15:30 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Orb1 votes

  Orb1 votes in favor.

  2025-03-24 15:38 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Chris Zuehlke

  Cumberland/DRW votes in favor.   I realize this has already passed, but think a follow up discussion is merited.   I’d like to reiterate a concern we raised previously about the need to introduce a process to review the associated featured app activity regularly.  The CIP itself recognizes there is a risk for misuse of the activity markers as well (“…FA providers are expected to created FA act

  2025-03-24 18:03 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Eric Saraniecki

  Yes please on (maybe not a CIP) but let's document exactly how we are going to approve this behavior for App rewards I think we can go even further than this and think about how to actively monitor this type of activity via partners in the network who do data analysis  toggle quoted message Show quoted text -- W. Eric Saraniecki Co-founder / +1 773 719 1983 Digital Asset, creators of Dam

  2025-03-24 18:12 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗

Same data through MCP:

• get_cip_votes({cip_id: "0047"}) — formatted markdown of each vote message in chronological order.
• get_cip_citations — full citation graph (includes the same vote messages plus everything else that references this CIP).
• get_cip_history — status transitions over time (/governance/timeline).
• GET /api/v1/cips/0047/mentions — aggregated backlinks (includes mailing-thread references).