← CIP-0050 · citation graph
CITATIONS / CIP-0050
Controlled Validator Growth Through Trusted Operators · status: Withdrawn
Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0050 — sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.
Mailing-list messages · 19 · across 1 thread
Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id — only-here join.
Happy to sponsor - MPCH (if needed) Get Outlook for iOS toggle quoted message Show quoted text
I still see no reason for this to be a CIP I'm not opposed if anyone wants to sponsor toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Hello, We had some great conversation on this CIP. We have updated the CIP based on the feedback here and in the GitHub PR. Review the new file here. We are proposing this as a process CIP, not a chan
Up to 10 to begin with and then come back to committee to reup your allotment We want to make sure we don't flood the system toggle quoted message Show quoted text
These lines were added from the minutes of the Tokenomics committee / working group meeting. Would a member of the GSF Tokenomics working group / committee like to comment or clarify?
Hi All, Regarding this CIP, I wanted to get some clarification on Lines 20-23 that state the following: 20. Existing Validator operators will be authorized to create up to 10 additional Validators for
Obsidian Systems would also like to participate. ryan.trinkle@... nathan.homesley@... On 3/13/25 08:04, Veronica Augustsson via lists.sync.global wrote: toggle quoted message Show quoted text
C7 would also like to participate. Could you register pinar@... and sophia@... Thank you! Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER I
Hi Amanda can you please include Proof Group here as well: Proof Group and we can use my email of chris@... toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Thanks Amanda, this is a great idea and we would like our information in that format as well. Christopher Kelly Head of Business Development | Americas IntellectEU intellecteu.com Digital Finance & Em
Hi Amanda - IntellectEU would like to participate as well. Please add christopher.kelly@... and jonathan.mayeur@... Thanks, Chris Christopher Kelly Head of Business Development | Americas IntellectEU
That is a fantastic idea. Thank you for that. Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me From: cip-discuss@... on behalf of DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global Date: Wednesday, M
Hello, In discussing this rather than have personal emails on the form we will generate an alias that will send the email to the contacts you want. This will protect your email while still getting the
Hi Amanda – MPCH would like to participate – kinga.bosse@..., milo.smith@..., matt.mareane@... Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me From: cip-discuss@... on behalf of DrAmand
Hello, I have changed the form to make this a little clearer. We should give contact information at the top of the form for all the existing operators interested in running for others. Can I get that
I would think 1 form is enough explaining at the top that it's only an application for new operators and listing contact information for existing operators they can reach out to instead of filling out
Some questions that it might be useful to clarify: * Should there be two forms on the GSF website: one for Validator Operators, and one for people / organizations seeking an Operator? Or would it be b
I see no reason for this to be a CIP The Tokenomics committee is currently responsible for designating approved new Validators to the Network and we were discussing how the committee would modify its
Hello, Please find the cip-0050 open for discussion at the PR https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/pull/39 In ord …
For AI agents
Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:
get_cip_citations— MCP tool. Input:{cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.GET /api/v1/cips/0050/citations— JSON shape mirroring this page.- The legacy
/api/v1/cips/0050/mentionsstays for backward compat — it returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.
