VOTES / CIP-0065

Super Validators executed 4 DSO vote requests whose stated reasoning cites this CIP. This is the ledger record, so it says what was carried out rather than what was discussed.

• 2026-08-12 · Create unclaimed activity record (lz-vault) · Accepted 13 for / 0 against
• 2026-07-31 · Create unclaimed activity record (Chainlink-Mainnet-1) · Accepted 13 for / 0 against
• 2025-10-01 · Update SV reward weight (Global-Synchronizer-Foundation) · Accepted 9 for / 0 against
• 2025-09-30 · Update SV reward weight (Global-Synchronizer-Foundation) · Rejected 4 for / 9 against

Positions are parsed from each message's body text (most are one-line statements like "Five North in favor"). If parsing was uncertain, the row appears as position unclear below, please flag if you spot a misread.

• in favor
  DrAmandaLMartin

  Hello Super Validator Node Owners,   Please find CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4 each ready for vote https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/blob/cip-0065-bridge-cip/cip-0065/cip-0065.md Digital Asset - SV Sponsor Proof Group - SV Endorser All other operators vote please list: <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor> Dr. Amanda L. Martin 814-

  2025-06-05 15:30 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Veronica Augustsson

  7RIDGE/C7 votes in favour   Veronica     V E R O N I C A   A U G U S T S S O N   /   P A R T N E R ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWER THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Signature for V e r o n i c a A u g u s t s s o n

  2025-06-07 22:38 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  SVNodeops votes

  SVNodeops votes in favor.

  2025-06-10 02:26 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  MPCH is

  MPCH is in favor.   Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me     From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists.sync.global <aman.goyal=sbisecsol.com@...> Date: Monday, June 9, 2025 at 10:26 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4 each SVNodeops votes in fav

  2025-06-10 13:06 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Five North votes

  Five North votes in favor.

  2025-06-10 13:10 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Cumberland DRW votes

  Cumberland DRW votes in favor.

  2025-06-13 21:45 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Tradeweb votes

  Tradeweb votes in favor From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of: DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> Date: Thursday, Jun 05, 2025 at 5:30 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: [cip-votes] CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4 each CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click

  2025-06-14 06:17 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  DrAmandaLMartin

  Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Due to a need to change the deliverables we are re-voting on CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4 each  https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/blob/618d82f56b89a49bac1243e19bdf81fc2e9227c0/cip-0065/cip-0065.md  Digital Asset - SV Sponsor Proof Group - SV Endorser All other operators vote please list: <SV Name> vo

  2025-07-11 15:52 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Yiannis Varelas

  So, the 7.5 proposal is mute and we go with this one? Also, the link posted (https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/cips/blob/cip-0065-bridge-cip/cip-0065/cip-0065.md) has a title of 4 but the actual text is 3. What is the correct one? On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 6:52 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Due

  2025-07-11 16:09 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Eric Saraniecki

  For Chainlink - there are 2 CIPs they are proposing The Bridge one you see here is for all 3 providers (Chainlink, LayerZero, Wormhole) to all get a 3 for connecting their bridges and then a bonus pool assigned for those who perform once live The other Chainlink CiP is about them integrating data oracles, proof of reserve, and building activity on chain around those  -- W. Eric Saraniecki Co

  2025-07-11 16:12 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  And Five North is

  And Five North is in favor of this.

  2025-07-11 16:17 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Thanks

  Thanks for clarifying Eric. On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 7:12 PM Eric Saraniecki via lists.sync.global <eric=digitalasset.com@...> wrote: For Chainlink - there are 2 CIPs they are proposing The Bridge one you see here is for all 3 providers (Chainlink, LayerZero, Wormhole) to all get a 3 for connecting their bridges and then a bonus pool assigned for those who perform once live The other Chainlink

  2025-07-11 16:17 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Proof Group votes

  Proof Group votes in favor (if not already counted as sponsor)

  2025-07-11 16:23 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Tradeweb votes

  Tradeweb votes in favor.  From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of: Chris Matturri <chris@...> Date: Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 5:23 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Cc: Yiannis Varelas <y@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4 each CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if

  2025-07-11 16:31 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  MPCH is

  MPCH is in favor   Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me     From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> Date: Friday, July 11, 2025 at 12:23 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Cc: Yiannis Varelas <y@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP 0065 Add Layer Zero, Wormhole, and Chainlink as SVs at Weight 4

  2025-07-11 18:11 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Liberty City Ventures votes

  Liberty City Ventures votes in favor.

  2025-07-11 18:30 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Cumberland DRW votes

  Cumberland DRW votes in favor.

  2025-07-14 13:41 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  SBI votes

  SBI votes in favor.

  2025-07-18 00:42 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗

Same data through MCP:

• get_cip_votes({cip_id: "0065"}): formatted markdown of each vote message in chronological order.
• get_cip_citations: full citation graph (includes the same vote messages plus everything else that references this CIP).
• get_cip_history: status transitions over time (/governance/timeline).
• GET /api/v1/cips/0065/mentions Returns aggregated backlinks (includes mailing-thread references).