← CIP-0067 · citation graph
CITATIONS / CIP-0067
One-Time Allocation of Historical Unclaimed Rewards to GSF · status: Final
Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0067 — sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.
Mailing-list messages · 34 · across 5 threads
Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id — only-here join.
We've recreated that vote with the correct amount of CC. Please vote in favor of 007d90e15a73947447a77eb720bbea9826dd25858629e3479be6175b623e2e7ba4ca111220949da3fa32f4d406ee9cd7fb9ca7c0826c34c291dcd96
Following with the transfer of the entire balance of unclaimed rewards (1,617,843,619.79 CC) from the pool to the designated GSF address GSF-SVRewards-1::12201725270d497ab23ceffd0d2acce46cc9da44586fd4
Following the approval of CIP-0067, this voting proposal covers a one-time MainNet Test allocation of 10 CC from the historical unclai …
The test vote on the TestNet to mint 10 CC from the unclaimed pool to the designated Global Synchronizer Foundation address is live. Details Vote ID: 0048461389c08b0fa77d6282e1da38dce7a3dc773899921af9
… fc48cdcc05a060f6bda2e470632935f375d1049a8546a3b262 CIP Deliverables that have been Approved include CIP-0067 One-Time Allocation of Historical Unclaimed Rewards to GSF is ready for implementation. There will …
According to CIP0067, before allocating the full amount of unclaimed rewards, we need to have at least one successfully completed de minimis-sized transfer from the unclaimed pool to the designated Gl
Hello, Canton Improvement Proposal CIP-0067: One-Time Allocation of Historical Unclaimed Rewards to GSF has been approved by vote of the Super …
… via lists.sync.global Date: Thursday, Jul 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM To: cip-vote@... Subject: [cip-votes] CIP-0067: One-Time Allocation of Historical Unclaimed Rewards to GSF CAUTION:This email originated from outs …
MPCH is in favor
SVNodeops is in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text
I'm in agreement with moving forward with Chris' proposal as well Christopher Kelly Head of Business Development | Americas IntellectEU intellecteu.com Digital Finance & Emerging Technologies +1 215-9
7RIDGE/C7 votes in favor. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWER
Five North in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Proof Group votes in favor toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Please find ready for vote: CIP-0067: One-Time Allocation of Historical Unclaimed Rewards to GSF https://github.com/global-synchronizer- …
Agree with Veronica and Eric here. Foundation needs autonomy and has already the mandate in place of what needs to be done. toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Many of these people on the validator wait list are really just trying to farm rewards and not actually contribute much to the network. Giving more rewards to validators is a bit counter to some of th
I would also advice against specifying how the GSF should manage these coins. Their whole purpose is to do what is best for the ecosystem already to the benefit of all. Veronica Från: cip-discuss@...
So would it be an option to reset and reallocate the Canton Coin to those pools in order to incentivize participation? I know that there is a waitlist for validators. Refreshing these pools might allo
unearned - Validator and App rewards toggle quoted message Show quoted text -- W. Eric Saraniecki Co-founder / +1 773 719 1983 Digital Asset, creators of Daml This message, and any attachments, is for
Which pool are the unallocated Canton from then? Get Outlook for iOS toggle quoted message Show quoted text
The SVs were never expected to earn these rewards I am opposed to specifying how the GSF would use them toggle quoted message Show quoted text
I believe that we are awaiting an answer as to other options. This is at current prices a ) $100 million allocation. Alternatives could include adding back to the SV reward pool. These were rewards th
Five North in favor as well and happy to sponsor/endorse as well. Y. toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Thank you Chris. 7RIDGE/C7 is in favour and happy to sponsor if needed. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMAT
GitHub items · 2
Issues, PRs, and dev-fund proposals across all indexed Canton repositories that mention CIP-0067.
For AI agents
Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:
get_cip_citations— MCP tool. Input:{cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.GET /api/v1/cips/0067/citations— JSON shape mirroring this page.- The legacy
/api/v1/cips/0067/mentionsstays for backward compat — it returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.
