VOTES / CIP-0073

Super Validators executed 1 DSO vote request whose stated reasoning cites this CIP. This is the ledger record, so it says what was carried out rather than what was discussed.

• 2026-02-24 · Change AmuletRules config · Accepted 11 for / 0 against

Positions are parsed from each message's body text (most are one-line statements like "Five North in favor"). If parsing was uncertain, the row appears as position unclear below — please flag if you spot a misread.

• in favor
  DrAmandaLMartin

  Hello Super Validator Node Owners,   Please find ready for vote: CIP 0073: Weighted Validator Liveness Rewards for SV-Determined Parties   Digital Asset - SV Sponsor MPCH - SV Endorser All other operators vote please list: <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  2025-08-19 18:46 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Tradeweb votes

  Tradeweb votes in favor.  From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of: DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> Date: Tuesday, Aug 19, 2025 at 7:46 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: [cip-votes] CIP 0073: Weighted Validator Liveness Rewards for SV-Determined Parties CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments

  2025-08-19 19:31 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Orb1 votes

  Orb1 votes in favor Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681   |   Telegram   |  LinkedIn From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Justin Peterson via lists.sync.global <justin.peterson=tradeweb.com@...> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 at 12:31 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP 0073: Weighted Validator Liveness Rewards for SV-Determined Parties Tradeweb votes in favor.

  2025-08-19 19:39 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Veronica Augustsson

  7RIDGE/C7 is in favor   veronica     V E R O N I C A   A U G U S T S S O N   /   P A R T N E R ​​​​ ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWER THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Signature for V e r o n i c a A u g u s t s s o n toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2025-08-21 15:00 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Proof Group votes

  Proof Group votes yes  toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2025-08-25 20:14 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Cumberland DRW is

  Cumberland DRW is in favor.   With our vote, we would like to reiterate a comment we made earlier.  We don’t believe the configurable liveness reward should ever be used to increase a party’s liveness reward on the basis of their participation in the network.  To do so would allocate liveness rewards for purposes that should be address via other mechanisms.    toggle quoted message Show quoted

  2025-08-26 22:19 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Yiannis Varelas

  Hi all, I haven’t voted on CIP-0073 yet. It solves the validator capacity problem, but it also introduces Weighted Licenses and MintingDelegation. That’s basically staking rails. Today it’s harmless. Tomorrow, someone ties weights to token balances and we’ve recreated PoS and whatever it comes with: centralization, governance capture, the whole mess.  That’s not what Canton should bec

  2025-08-27 13:05 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗

Same data through MCP:

• get_cip_votes({cip_id: "0073"}) — formatted markdown of each vote message in chronological order.
• get_cip_citations — full citation graph (includes the same vote messages plus everything else that references this CIP).
• get_cip_history — status transitions over time (/governance/timeline).
• GET /api/v1/cips/0073/mentions — aggregated backlinks (includes mailing-thread references).