← CIP-0094 · votes

VOTES / CIP-0094

Add Blockdaemon as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) · current status: Approved · type: Governance

Vote record for CIP-0094, sourced from the Canton cip-vote mailing list (recent CIPs) and vote-tally PDFs attached to the CIP repo (older CIPs).

8 votes recorded● for 7● against 0● abstain 0● unclear 1range 2025-12-30 → 2026-01-07MCP: get_cip_votes

Tally

100%
in favor · 7 against · 0 abstain · 0 unclear · 1

Positions are parsed from each message's body text (most are one-line statements like "Five North in favor"). If parsing was uncertain, the row appears as position unclear below — please flag if you spot a misread.

Individual votes · 8

  • in favor
    Amanda Martin
    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,   Please find ready for vote: CIP-0094: Add Blockdaemon as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) MPCH - SV Sponsor 7Ridge - SV Endorser All other operators vote please list: <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
    2025-12-30 17:22 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • position unclear
    Proof Group votes
    Proof Group votes yes  Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@... ProofGroup.xyz toggle quoted message Show quoted text
    2025-12-30 18:48 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    Tradeweb votes
    Tradeweb votes in favor.  From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of: Chris Matturri <chris@...> Date: Tuesday, Dec 30, 2025 at 1:48 PM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0094: Add Blockdaemon as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender or i
    2025-12-30 22:44 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    Orb1 votes
    Orb1 votes in favor  Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681 toggle quoted message Show quoted text
    2025-12-30 22:46 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    Chris Zuehlke
    Cumberland/DRW votes in favor, but I’d like to make two points clear with our vote: 1) Regarding milestone 1: We believe the Accountability committee should not include ping-pong or other “outside of guidance” transaction patterns in the count. 2) Regarding milestone 3: The foundation should rely on the Accountability Committee to determine what is a new customer or a novel transaction type.  
    2025-12-30 22:54 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    DA
    DA in favor and support Cumberland's clarifications  On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 12:54 AM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote: Cumberland/DRW votes in favor, but I’d like to make two points clear with our vote: 1) Regarding milestone 1: We believe the Accountability committee should not include ping-pong or other “outside of guidance” transaction patterns in t
    2025-12-31 14:57 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    Liberty City Ventures votes
    Liberty City Ventures votes in favor   toggle quoted message Show quoted text
    2025-12-31 16:08 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
  • in favor
    SBI is
    SBI is in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text
    2026-01-07 09:40 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗

For AI agents

Same data through MCP:

  • get_cip_votes({cip_id: "0094"}) — formatted markdown of each vote message in chronological order.
  • get_cip_citations — full citation graph (includes the same vote messages plus everything else that references this CIP).
  • get_cip_history — status transitions over time (/governance/timeline).
  • GET /api/v1/cips/0094/mentions — aggregated backlinks (includes mailing-thread references).