Skip to content

← CIP-0106 · citation graph

CITATIONS / CIP-0106

Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) · status: Approved

Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0106 — sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.

38 total referencesSibling CIPs 0Forum posts 0Mailing messages 27GitHub items 11Blog posts 0YouTube videos 0JSONMCP: get_cip_citations

Mailing-list messages · 27 · across 3 threads

Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id — only-here join.

  • Tokenomics Outcomes[tokenomics-announce] · @July 1st 2026 · 19d ago

    … lestones Met The following CIP Milestones have been reviewed and approved by Tokenomics as complete CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) This approval is conditional upon them reporting m …

  • CIP-TBD: Infrasingularity max weight 5 SV - Vitesh Malhotra[cip-discuss] · @Eric Saraniecki · 3mo ago

    … on hashes, volume/burn breakdown, owned vs. pro-rata). SV Reward Mechanics* (verbatim from approved CIP-0106 / CIP-0094 / CIP-0110) InfraSingularity is responsible for all costs of the escrow SV. The escrow S …

  • CIP-TBD: Infrasingularity max weight 5 SV - Vitesh Malhotra[cip-discuss] · @Vitesh Malhotra · 3mo ago

    … on hashes, volume/burn breakdown, owned vs. pro-rata). SV Reward Mechanics* (verbatim from approved CIP-0106 / CIP-0094 / CIP-0110) InfraSingularity is responsible for all costs of the escrow SV. The escrow S …

  • Vote Proposal to host escrow weight of ChainSafe on 5N SV[supervalidator-announce] · @vd@fivenorth.io · 3mo ago

    According to CIP-0106 ChainSafe is approved as an SV of max Weight 5 (5_0000 bps). The voting proposal is to increase Fiv …

  • Vote Proposal to host escrow weight of QCP Group (QCP) on 5N SV[supervalidator-announce] · @vd@fivenorth.io · 4mo ago

    According to CIP-0106 QCP Group (QCP) is approved as an SV of max Weight 5 (5_0000 bps). The voting proposal is to increa …

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-announce] · cip_id match · @Amanda Martin · 4mo ago

    Hello, Canton Improvement Proposal has been approved by vote of the Super Validator Node Operators: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) The vote reached a passing quorum on 2026-03-05 wi …

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Kinga Bosse · 4mo ago

    … sts.sync.global Date: Thursday, March 5, 2026 at 11:32 AM To: cip-vote@... Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) Tradeweb votes in favor. toggle quoted message Sho …

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Justin Peterson · 4mo ago

    Tradeweb votes in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Chris Matturri · 4mo ago

    Proof Group votes in favor of the new vote Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@... ProofGroup.xyz toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Yiannis Varelas · 4mo ago

    5North in Favor

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Luca Toscani · 4mo ago

    orb 1 votes in favor Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681 toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Aman Goyal · 4mo ago

    SBI votes in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Amanda Martin · 4mo ago

    … the updated CIP and cast your vote accordingly (again if already voted) Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed s …

  • Abstract[cip-discuss] · @Justus Delp · 4mo ago

    … should use the same standard — a $2M Canton Coin burn for +0.5 — that was used for QCP's proposal (CIP-0106) versus the initially proposed +0.5 for every $10M in Canton Coin burned. Given the new high-water …

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Chris Zuehlke · 4mo ago

    (Sorry for posting these comments here rather than in the discuss forum, but given this is moving to vote thought best to include here) While we agree that the Eligible Burn & Sustainment Criteria cla

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Chris Matturri · 4mo ago

    Proof Group votes yes- we agree with the feedback shared earlier on burn activity and think this will set a good standard going forward. toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)[cip-vote] · cip_id match · @Amanda Martin · 4mo ago

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed s …

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Veronica Augustsson · 4mo ago

    If we need a sponsor for this, 7RIDGE/C7 is pleased to sponsor. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R ​​​​ ​ 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Eric Saraniecki · 4mo ago

    Very happy to endorse toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Yiannis Varelas · 4mo ago

    We are OK with 18 months. If there is no further comment we can move it to vote with 18 if you want to endorse. Y. toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Eric Saraniecki · 4mo ago

    thanks Yiannis - i think this is great and def something we will be able to use in other contexts going forward my only open question is around the timeline to achieve the burn recognition - i think 2

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Yiannis Varelas · 4mo ago

    Hi all, I had very good async calls and I'm posting here the updated Full CIP with the changes I proposed above plus a summary of the changes for reference. Summary of Amendments 1. Recalibration of M

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Yiannis Varelas · 4mo ago

    Hi all, Alex's feedback raised some async discussions with existing and potential new SVs. There is a valid broader concern around how activity-based weight fits the SV narrative. Rather than debate p

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Yiannis Varelas · 5mo ago

    Hi Alex, You’ve raised good points. I spoke with a few other SVs as well after your note. I’m going to hold off on pushing this to a vote for now and come back with an updated version that reflects th

  • CIP-00xx[cip-discuss] · cip_id match · @Alex Chen · 5mo ago

    Hi Yiannis, thanks for this submission. We're excited about QCP's involvement - prior to voting, I'm curious about some components about this proposal: Collateral Application: Would this be a part of

GitHub items · 11

Issues, PRs, and dev-fund proposals across all indexed Canton repositories that mention CIP-0106.

For AI agents

Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:

  • get_cip_citations — MCP tool. Input: {cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.
  • GET /api/v1/cips/0106/citations — JSON shape mirroring this page.
  • The legacy /api/v1/cips/0106/mentions stays for backward compat — it returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.