VOTES / CIP-0106

Super Validators executed 1 DSO vote request whose stated reasoning cites this CIP. This is the ledger record, so it says what was carried out rather than what was discussed.

• 2026-03-27 · Update SV reward weight (Five-North-1) · Accepted 13 for / 0 against

Positions are parsed from each message's body text (most are one-line statements like "Five North in favor"). If parsing was uncertain, the row appears as position unclear below — please flag if you spot a misread.

• in favor
  Amanda Martin

  Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state 3e3b94f3545169f1fd01abfa6d1a9f2c9341bcc8 No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status. Sponsors / Endorsers Digital Asset– SV Sponsor 7Ridge – SV Endo

  2026-03-02 19:56 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Proof Group votes

  Proof Group votes yes- we agree with the feedback shared earlier on burn activity and think this will set a good standard going forward.   toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2026-03-02 20:14 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• position unclear
  Chris Zuehlke

  (Sorry for posting these comments here rather than in the discuss forum, but given this is moving to vote thought best to include here) While we agree that the Eligible Burn & Sustainment Criteria clause is a definite move in the right direction for activity-based CIPs, I think there need to be a few clarifications and edits to align this type of CIP with the perpetual nature of SV rewards. If th

  2026-03-02 23:37 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  THIS IS A NEW VOTE

  THIS IS A NEW VOTE for QCP. Please see the updated CIP and cast your vote accordingly (again if already voted) Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state cf1cd7997b24b1ec1093d515f5a7644d954864d2 No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date

  2026-03-04 19:05 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  SBI votes

  SBI votes in favor. toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2026-03-05 04:06 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  orb 1 votes

  orb 1 votes in favor Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681 toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2026-03-05 09:51 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Yiannis Varelas

  5North in Favor

  2026-03-05 12:25 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Proof Group votes

  Proof Group votes in favor of the new vote  Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@... ProofGroup.xyz toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2026-03-05 13:30 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  Tradeweb votes

  Tradeweb votes in favor.   toggle quoted message Show quoted text

  2026-03-05 16:32 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗
• in favor
  MPCH is

  MPCH is in favor Kinga Z. Bosse COO|MPCH|www.mpch.com Book time to meet with me   From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Justin Peterson via lists.sync.global <justin.peterson=tradeweb.com@...> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2026 at 11:32 AM To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0) Tradeweb votes in favor.  

  2026-03-05 19:45 UTC · open on lists.sync.global ↗

Same data through MCP:

• get_cip_votes({cip_id: "0106"}) — formatted markdown of each vote message in chronological order.
• get_cip_citations — full citation graph (includes the same vote messages plus everything else that references this CIP).
• get_cip_history — status transitions over time (/governance/timeline).
• GET /api/v1/cips/0106/mentions — aggregated backlinks (includes mailing-thread references).