← CIP-0111 · citation graph
CITATIONS / CIP-0111
Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight · status: Approved
Every place across CCPEDIA's corpus that references CIP-0111: sibling CIPs, forum threads, the cip-* / grants-* mailing lists, GitHub issues + PRs across all indexed Canton repos, third-party blog coverage, and YouTube transcripts. Each section samples the most recent N; counts above the sample are the totals.
Mailing-list messages · 31 · across 9 threads
Messages on cip-vote, cip-discuss, grants-discuss, and other validator-announce lists. Items with cip_id_match badge come from CCPEDIA-parsed mailing_messages.cip_id: only-here join.
… low the Tier 1 locking threshold under CIP-0105 (SV Locking) and the governance process outlined in CIP-0111 recommends an SV weight adjustments. Proposed Changes Taurus → Reduce to Tier 2 (60% weight) due to …
… rded from the quorum, and removed from the Global Synchronizer, via the separate process defined in CIP-0111. Automated weight reduction does not preclude the Super Validators from separately voting to raise …
… was announced here. CIP Ghost Removal The following Ghost SVs should be removed in accordance with CIP-0111 Woodside PartyID: WoodsideAI-ghost-1::1220f5cf298f609f538b46a2a0347d299028ddca7ea008aaed65e0ca862db …
… to the final state. CIP Ghost Removal The following Ghost SVs should be removed in accordance with CIP-0111 Woodside PartyID: WoodsideAI-ghost-1::1220f5cf298f609f538b46a2a0347d299028ddca7ea008aaed65e0ca862db …
… b: https://github.com/canton-foundation/cips/blob/68651c6639ee2d86906466df4e07b1f240693cbb/cip-0115/cip-0111.md
I would like to suggest an improvement to the reporting about votes. Actual abstentions should be reported separately from non-votes.
… per Validators, Following review under CIP-0105 (SV Locking) and the governance process outlined in CIP-0111, Tokenomics recommends the following SV weight adjustments due to non-compliance with locking requi …
… llo, Canton Improvement Proposal has been approved by a vote of the Super Validator Node Operators: CIP-0111: Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight The vote reached a passing quorum on 2026-04-23 with t …
7RIDGE/C7 votes in favour. Veronica V E R O N I C A A U G U S T S S O N / P A R T N E R 7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWE
… ts.sync.global Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2026 at 9:31 PM To: cip-vote@... Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0111: Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight SBI votes in favor. On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 1:38 AM Am …
SBI votes in favor.
Tradeweb votes in favor
… Martin via lists.sync.global wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Please find ready for vote: CIP-0111: Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state …
Proof Group votes in favor
Hello Super Validator Node Owners, Please find ready for vote: CIP-0111: Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state …
Happy to have MPCH/DA sponsor/endorse. Great to see this level of support for such an important CIP.
DA also happy to sponsor/endorse On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 11:22 AM Kinga Bosse via lists.sync.global wrote: Alex - many thanks for this update. MPCH would like to sponsor or endorse. Get Outlook for Ma
Alex - many thanks for this update. MPCH would like to sponsor or endorse. Get Outlook for Mac From: cip-discuss@... on behalf of Alex Chen via lists.sync.global Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2026 at 11:
Hi all, following today’s TWG discussion, please see below for the updated draft CIP for SV Weight Reduction. CIP‑01XX: Process for Reducing Super Validator Weight Type: Governance Status: Draft Autho
fine by me - we need this general ability to remove weight from the pool for the SV Locking and we can address the other points at a later date thanks for advancing this On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 6:22 P
Hi All, Cumberland would like to propose the following path forward for this CIP based on feedback from the community: Remove the offboarding of a SV node if the operator's weight goes to 0. While we
Thanks to all for the work on this CIP. Given its importance, I strongly believe this should be afforded a slot at our next foundation meeting for open discussion before finalization.
Hi James - This CIP proposes to remove an SV if its weight is reduced to 0. There are multiple ways that can theoretically happen including as set forth by the SV Locking CIP or reasons not yet contem
This CIP appears to remove an SV from the Canton Network if it does not lock tokens. Is this interpretation correct?
There are still some technical gaps in the proposed implementation details; I'll reach out to Cumberland.
GitHub items · 7
Issues, PRs, and dev-fund proposals across all indexed Canton repositories that mention CIP-0111.
… IP-0107, CIP-0112, CIP-0117 (Standards Track); CIP-0105, CIP-0114, CIP-0116, CIP-0119 (Tokenomics); CIP-0111 (Process). Corrected CIP-0082 and CIP-0100 status from Approved to Active.
The vote expires on 2026-05-14 11:00 UTC The vote becomes effective on 2026-05-15 11:00 UTC
The vote expires on 2026-05-14 11:00 UTC The vote becomes effective on 2026-05-15 11:00 UTC
The vote expires on 2026-05-14 11:00 UTC The vote becomes effective on 2026-05-15 11:00 UTC
For AI agents
Same citation graph through programmatic surfaces:
get_cip_citations: MCP tool. Input:{cip_id}. Output: counts plus sample items per source. Use when an agent needs "everything that references CIP-X across CCPEDIA's corpus" in one round-trip.GET /api/v1/cips/0111/citationsReturns a JSON shape mirroring this page.- The legacy
/api/v1/cips/0111/mentionsstays for backward compat. It returns topic / thread counts; this new endpoint returns per-post / per-message granularity plus GitHub and YouTube coverage.