CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
- Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor> - toggle quoted message Show quoted textOn Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor> - toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Tradeweb votes in favor
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2025 8:59 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningCAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender or if the content appears unsafe/you cannot verify the content is safe.
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Tradeweb reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Tradeweb e-mail system. - toggle quoted message Show quoted text
All –
I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap. The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.
Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.
I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote. Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningProof group votes yes Chris Matturri chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Proof group votes yes
Chris Matturri
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textWe would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to thisOn Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:
All –
I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap. The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.
Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.
I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote. Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningProof group votes yes Chris Matturri chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Proof group votes yes
Chris Matturri
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textAfter discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal
Chris Matturri chris@... ProofGroup.xyz On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to thisOn Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:All –
I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap. The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.
Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.
I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote. Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningProof group votes yes Chris Matturri chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Proof group votes yes
Chris Matturri
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textFrom: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2025 18:15
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningAfter discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal
Chris Matturri
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:
We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:
All –
I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap. The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.
Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.
I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote. Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningProof group votes yes Chris Matturri chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Proof group votes yes
Chris Matturri
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects. - toggle quoted message Show quoted text
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 12:15:23 PM
To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...>
Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningAfter discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal
Chris Matturri chris@... ProofGroup.xyz
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:
We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:
All –
I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap. The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.
Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.
I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote. Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.
Thanks
Chris
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningProof group votes yes Chris Matturri chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Proof group votes yes
Chris Matturri
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textSBI votes in favor.On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor> - toggle quoted message Show quoted textOrb 1 in favor
SBI votes in favor.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
- toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Cumberland DRW votes in favor.
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Luca Toscani
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 1:19 PM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningOrb 1 in favor Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681 | Telegram | LinkedIn From: cip-vote@ lists. sync. global <cip-vote@ lists. sync. global> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists. sync. global <aman. goyal=sbisecsol. com@ lists. sync. global> Date: Thursday,
Orb 1 in favor
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists.sync.global <aman.goyal=sbisecsol.com@...>
Date: Thursday, October 16, 2025 at 10:51 AM
To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...>
Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningSBI votes in favor.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
5North - SV Endorser
All other operators vote please list:
<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.