Skip to content
Mailing Lists/CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price TuningSource on lists.sync.global ↗

CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

cip-voteCIP-008411 messagesstarted 07-10-2025
  1. #1DrAmandaLMartin07-10-2025source ↗
    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  2. #2Chris Matturri07-10-2025source ↗
    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri
    chris@...
    ProofGroup.xyz


    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  3. #3Justin Peterson07-10-2025source ↗

    Tradeweb votes in favor

     

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global
    Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2025 8:59 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender or if the content appears unsafe/you cannot verify the content is safe.

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    ________________________________________________________________________

    The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

    Tradeweb reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Tradeweb e-mail system.

  4. #4Chris Zuehlke07-10-2025source ↗

    All –

     

    I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

     

    Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

     

    I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

     

    Thanks

    Chris

     

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
    Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.
  5. #5Chris Matturri08-10-2025source ↗
    We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this 
    toggle quoted message Show quoted text


    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:

    All –

     

    I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

     

    Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

     

    I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

     

    Thanks

    Chris

     

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
    Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

  6. #6Chris Matturri16-10-2025source ↗
    After discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal 

    Chris Matturri
    chris@...
    ProofGroup.xyz


    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:
    We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this 

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:

    All –

     

    I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

     

    Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

     

    I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

     

    Thanks

    Chris

     

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
    Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

  7. #7Veronica Augustsson16-10-2025source ↗

    7RIDGE/C7 also votes in favour

     

    Veronica

     

     
    V E R O N I C A   A U G U S T S S O N
      /  P A R T N E R

    image261723.png
    7RIDGE IS A PRIVATE MARKETS ASSET MANAGER INVESTED IN TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES TO POWER THE GLOBAL ECONOMY

    Signature for V e r o n i c a A u g u s t s s o n

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global
    Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2025 18:15
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    After discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:

    We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this 

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:

    All –

     

    I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

     

    Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

     

    I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

     

    Thanks

    Chris

     

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
    Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@proofgroup.xyz ProofGroup.xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@lists.sync.global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

  8. #8Kinga Bosse16-10-2025source ↗
    MPCH is in favor 

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text


    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...>
    Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 12:15:23 PM
    To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...>
    Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    After discussion and weighing some of the options- Proof Group has decided to vote yes for this proposal 

    Chris Matturri
    chris@...
    ProofGroup.xyz


    On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Chris Matturri via lists.sync.global <chris=proofgroup.xyz@...> wrote:
    We would like to temporarily recall our vote until we have a chance to chat with Chris Z & team to hear their alternative proposal to this 

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM Chris Zuehlke via lists.sync.global <czuehlke=drwholdings.com@...> wrote:

    All –

     

    I was hopeful that we would get a chance to discuss this during our call tomorrow before it moved to vote. I think this is an important topic with nuance to consider as well as a potential alternative/additive element to consider—introducing a similar mechanism to enable updating the FA reward multiplier or cap.  The approach would, I believe, have a similar effect as the current proposal but perhaps be more intuitive.  

     

    Its entirely possible that the correct approach is enabling both—one to address changes in the infrastructure costs of the increasing utility provided by the network and one to account for changing elastic/in-elastic demand dynamics for the network’s applications.

     

    I would like to discuss this topic during tomorrow’s call before casting Cumberland DRWs vote.  Everyone is obviously free to proceed as they wish, but I think it would helpful to most if we could discuss, and consider alternatives, before the vote completes.

     

    Thanks

    Chris

     

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
    Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:45 AM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Proof group votes yes Chris Matturri ​​​​ chris@ proofgroup. xyz ProofGroup. xyz On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8: 59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists. sync. global <amartin=linuxfoundation. org@ lists. sync. global> wrote: Hello Super Validator Node Owners,

    Proof group votes yes 

    Chris Matturri

    chris@...

    ProofGroup.xyz

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:59 AM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

  9. #9Aman Goyal16-10-2025source ↗
    SBI votes in favor.

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text


    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  10. #10Luca Toscani16-10-2025source ↗
    Orb 1 in favor

    Luca Toscani

    (650) 283-3681   |   Telegram   |  LinkedIn

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists.sync.global <aman.goyal=sbisecsol.com@...>
    Date: Thursday, October 16, 2025 at 10:51 AM
    To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...>
    Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

    SBI votes in favor.


    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

  11. #11Chris Zuehlke17-10-2025source ↗

    Cumberland DRW votes in favor.

     

    toggle quoted message Show quoted text

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Luca Toscani
    Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 1:19 PM
    To: cip-vote@...
    Subject: [ext] Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

     

    Orb 1 in favor Luca Toscani (650) 283-3681 | Telegram | LinkedIn From: cip-vote@ lists. sync. global <cip-vote@ lists. sync. global> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists. sync. global <aman. goyal=sbisecsol. com@ lists. sync. global> Date: Thursday,

    Orb 1 in favor

     

    Luca Toscani

    (650) 283-3681   |   Telegram   |  LinkedIn

    From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> on behalf of Aman Goyal via lists.sync.global <aman.goyal=sbisecsol.com@...>
    Date: Thursday, October 16, 2025 at 10:51 AM
    To: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...>
    Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning

    SBI votes in favor.

     

     

    On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM DrAmandaLMartin via lists.sync.global <amartin=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:

    Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
     
    Please find ready for vote: CIP-0084: Tokenomics Committee to Recommend $/MB Price Tuning
     
    Digital Asset - SV Sponsor
    5North - SV Endorser

    All other operators vote please list:
    <SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>

     


    This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.