CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state
3e3b94f3545169f1fd01abfa6d1a9f2c9341bcc8
No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status.
Sponsors / Endorsers
Digital Asset– SV Sponsor
7Ridge – SV Endorser
Voting Instructions
All other operators, please reply with:<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>If you believe any change made after this announcement is substantive, please vote not in favor and include your reasoning in the vote response.
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textProof Group votes yes- we agree with the feedback shared earlier on burn activity and think this will set a good standard going forward.On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 2:56 PM Amanda Martin via lists.sync.global <amanda=canton.foundation@...> wrote:
Hello Super Validator Node Owners,
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state
3e3b94f3545169f1fd01abfa6d1a9f2c9341bcc8
No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status.
Sponsors / Endorsers
Digital Asset– SV Sponsor
7Ridge – SV Endorser
Voting Instructions
All other operators, please reply with:<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>If you believe any change made after this announcement is substantive, please vote not in favor and include your reasoning in the vote response.
- (Sorry for posting these comments here rather than in the discuss forum, but given this is moving to vote thought best to include here)
While we agree that the Eligible Burn & Sustainment Criteria clause is a definite move in the right direction for activity-based CIPs, I think there need to be a few clarifications and edits to align this type of CIP with the perpetual nature of SV rewards. If the below were addressed we would be a yes vote, but we'd like to see them resolved first:- Eligible Burn Criteria: We think this is vague in ways that can lead to confusion/disagreement when milestones and ongoing commitments are reviewed. As we've learned, its best to clarify any points that could be interpreted multiple ways at time of CIP rather than afterwards.
- In (4) the inclusion of 3rd party CP burn can create a situation where two parties both with CIPs that are activity based (volume or burn) are claiming the same activity for their own milestones. For instance, two SVs conduct a bi-lateral derivatives trade with frequent margin management leading to burn. The same could be said for SVs that have deployed apps where another SV is a participant in that app. We don't believe double counting is appropriate but we also recognize why attributing burn via 3rd party app could be in scope. High level, we believe burn should be attributed pro-rata to the relevant parties.
- We believe that eligible burn or general activity should be specifically done by QCP or the "Proposer" of the CIP and conducted from a list of owned addresses provided by the Proposer to the Accountability Committee to track the milestone metrics to. Where the burn is conducted from a 3rd party address we are open to including it provided it could be definitively allocated to a party once (even if only a pro-rata portion).
- We recognize this could become resource-intensive to monitor for as as more of these CIPs are drafted, but also believe this is necessary to (i) ensure the Proposer owns / is responsible for their activity and (ii) avoid double or even triple counting if multiple different Proposers interact with one another on-chain.
- Sustainment Requirement:
- Because the milestone criteria is approved on a point-in-time aggregate activity snapshot rather than a rate of change, we would like to specify the terminology and calculation. To be specific, the "reference rate" would be defined as the per 2-quarter rate of proposed activity, calculated as:
- reference rate = (aggregate milestone acceptance criteria activity amount ) / ( milestone approval date - CIP approval date )
- I also believe that the sustainment period should live in perpetuity, rather than be cut off at 3-years, to align with the duration of the SV grant.
- Because the milestone criteria is approved on a point-in-time aggregate activity snapshot rather than a rate of change, we would like to specify the terminology and calculation. To be specific, the "reference rate" would be defined as the per 2-quarter rate of proposed activity, calculated as:
The purpose of these changes is not to create additional complexity, but rather clarity and alignment.
ThanksChris - Eligible Burn Criteria: We think this is vague in ways that can lead to confusion/disagreement when milestones and ongoing commitments are reviewed. As we've learned, its best to clarify any points that could be interpreted multiple ways at time of CIP rather than afterwards.
THIS IS A NEW VOTE for QCP. Please see the updated CIP and cast your vote accordingly (again if already voted)
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
-
The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state
cf1cd7997b24b1ec1093d515f5a7644d954864d2
No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status.
Sponsors / Endorsers
-
Digital Asset– SV Sponsor
-
7Ridge – SV Endorser
Voting Instructions
All other operators, please reply with:<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>If you believe any change made after this announcement is substantive, please vote not in favor and include your reasoning in the vote response.
-
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textSBI votes in favor.On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 4:05 AM Amanda Martin via lists.sync.global <amanda=canton.foundation@...> wrote:
THIS IS A NEW VOTE for QCP. Please see the updated CIP and cast your vote accordingly (again if already voted)
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
-
The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state
cf1cd7997b24b1ec1093d515f5a7644d954864d2
No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status.
Sponsors / Endorsers
-
Digital Asset– SV Sponsor
-
7Ridge – SV Endorser
Voting Instructions
All other operators, please reply with:<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>If you believe any change made after this announcement is substantive, please vote not in favor and include your reasoning in the vote response.
-
- orb 1 votes in favortoggle quoted message Show quoted text
Luca Toscani(650) 283-3681
On Mar 4, 2026, at 11:06 PM, Aman Goyal via lists.sync.global <aman.goyal=sbisecsol.com@...> wrote:
SBI votes in favor.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 4:05 AM Amanda Martin via lists.sync.global <amanda=canton.foundation@...> wrote:
THIS IS A NEW VOTE for QCP. Please see the updated CIP and cast your vote accordingly (again if already voted)
Please find ready for vote: CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)
-
The CIP text as merged in GitHub at the Proposed state
cf1cd7997b24b1ec1093d515f5a7644d954864d2
No changes will be made to the CIP text after this announcement other than updating the approval date and status.
Sponsors / Endorsers
-
Digital Asset– SV Sponsor
-
7Ridge – SV Endorser
Voting Instructions
All other operators, please reply with:<SV Name> votes <in favor | not in favor>If you believe any change made after this announcement is substantive, please vote not in favor and include your reasoning in the vote response.
-
- 5North in Favor
- toggle quoted message Show quoted textOn Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 7:25 AM Yiannis Varelas via lists.sync.global <y=fivenorth.io@...> wrote:5North in Favor
- toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Tradeweb votes in favor.
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2026 8:30 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender or if the content appears unsafe/you cannot verify the content is safe.
Proof Group votes in favor of the new vote
Chris Matturri
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 7:25 AM Yiannis Varelas via lists.sync.global <y=fivenorth.io@...> wrote:
5North in Favor
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Tradeweb reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Tradeweb e-mail system. - toggle quoted message Show quoted textMPCH is in favor
Tradeweb votes in favor.
From: cip-vote@... <cip-vote@...> On Behalf Of Chris Matturri
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2026 8:30 AM
To: cip-vote@...
Subject: Re: [cip-votes] CIP-0106: Add QCP Group as a Super Validator (weight 5.0)CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Tradeweb. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender or if the content appears unsafe/you cannot verify the content is safe.
Proof Group votes in favor of the new vote
Chris Matturri
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 7:25 AM Yiannis Varelas via lists.sync.global <y=fivenorth.io@...> wrote:
5North in Favor
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Tradeweb reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Tradeweb e-mail system.
